Trust Center
How a security or privacy incident is handled, in what order, and who is told. The affected firm always hears from us first.
Effective
28 September 2026
Owner
Security Lead, RealEstAi Inc.
Questions
contactus@realestai.ca
This policy covers the RealEstAi platform, the cloud and source-control accounts that run it, company email, vendor consoles and any device that can reach them.
| Tier | Meaning | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Severity 1, critical | Customer data is exposed, altered or lost, or an attacker is active now. | One firm’s matter reached by another firm or an outsider; an administrator account taken over; a production secret exposed; customer data destroyed or held to ransom. |
| Severity 2, high | Serious exposure is possible but not confirmed or is confined; or the service is down. | A leaked credential with no sign of use; one non-administrator account compromised within its own firm; a misdirected message containing identity data; a full outage. |
| Severity 3, moderate | Limited impact; no sensitive exposure. | Partial outage; a failed release rolled back; probing stopped by the controls. |
| Severity 4, low | Record only. | A single blocked probe; a phishing email reported and not acted on. |
Severity sets urgency. Whether an incident is a privacy breach is a separate question, asked every time.
Outside communication states facts and states what is not yet known. A copy of everything sent is kept in the incident log. We make no public statement naming a firm without its consent.
For information on a client file, the firm is the organization with control of the information, and RealEstAi is its service provider. The duty to notify the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta under PIPA section 34.1 therefore rests with the firm; RealEstAi’s job is to give the firm the facts promptly and in enough detail for the firm to make its own assessment. For information RealEstAi controls itself, such as platform accounts and billing contacts, RealEstAi assesses, decides and notifies.
What we give an affected firm:
The test for notifying the Commissioner is whether a reasonable person would consider there is a real risk of significant harm to an individual; our practice is to write out the reasoning rather than a one-word rating, and where it is genuinely unclear, to report. Notice is given without unreasonable delay, in writing, with the content prescribed by the PIPA Regulation. Where federal law applies, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is notified as soon as feasible and affected individuals are notified directly.
Every privacy breach is entered in a register, whether or not it was reportable, including near misses where information was exposed but not seen. Each entry records when it was discovered, occurred, contained and closed; what happened and why; the types of information and the firms involved; the estimated number of individuals; the risk-of-harm assessment with its reasoning and who made the decision; when the Commissioner, the firms and individuals were notified; and the follow-up actions. Entries cannot be deleted, every change is recorded with the values before and after, and the register can be exported for the Commissioner or an auditor. Entries are kept for at least 24 months from the date the breach was determined.
This policy is reviewed on a regular cadence and after every Severity 1 or 2 incident.
Trust Center